Bell State Bank & Trust v. Oakland
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Margaret Oakland appeals from a judgment dismissing her objection to the probate of the will of her father, John T. Gassmann, after a jury found she failed to establish his will was the product of an insane delusion and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. Oakland argues the district court erred in excluding relevant evidence at trial and the court did not adequately address issues raised in her motion for new trial. We affirm.
I
[¶2] Oakland is Gassmann’s only biological child. She graduated from high school in 1991, and her parents separated around that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Schwab v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PowleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Condon v. St. Alexius Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Wollan v. Innovis HealthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- City of Jamestown v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.