State v. Patterson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in its charge to the jury by instructing that if it found that either defendant had committed the acts charged then both would be guilty. Defendants assign as error the following portion of the court’s charge:
*245So I charge you that if you find all of the essentials I am about to give you in regard to common law robbery existed on this day, the 24th of March 1978, and that Pete Patterson and Barbara Hough acted either by himself or herself, or acted together with the common design of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. TomblinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. CottinghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980