Lineberry v. Shull
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NUGENT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Cheryl Lineberry, and her parents, third-party defendants, appeal from a verdict in favor of defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Bill Shull and Vickie Smith. Plaintiff complains of the court’s actions concerning voir dire, direct examination of plaintiff’s expert, examination of defendant’s expert, and the amount of time allowed her by the court for closing argument. We affirm the judgment in favor of defendants which renders the issues raised by third-party defendants moot.
On July 18, 1974, Cheryl Frock, now Cheryl Lineberry, was a passenger in a car operated by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Littell v. Bi-State Transit Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. TolliverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Aliff v. CodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Williams v. DausMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BlackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Steenrod v. Klipsch Hauling Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.