Legal Opinion

Williams v. Daus

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 2003No. 25065PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Dr. Arthur S. Daus (“Appellant”) appeals from a jury verdict against him based on medical negligence related to two surgeries performed on Madonna J. Williams (“Respondent”). Appellant asserts five points of trial court error. The first three points essentially claim that Respondent failed to make a submissible case on some of the categories of damages awarded to Respondent. In Point IV, Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after a juror acquired and related to jurors extrajudicial evidence which prejudiced Appellant. Lastly, in…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anglim v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Alcorn v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. Seabaugh v. Milde Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Houston v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Howard v. Missouri Bone and Joint Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Bmk Corp. v. Clayton Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Shirley Brinkley v. Pliva, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Syn, Inc. v. BeebeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API