Smithwick v. Frame
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The 9 December 1981 Order, finding defendants in contempt, is challenged by defendants on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction under G.S. 5A-23 to consider the issue of contempt. The contempt order reserved punishment of defendants until final disposition of the child custody matter. In its 21 December 1981 order, disposing of the child custody matter, the court, at the request of the plaintiff, elected not to punish defendants for contempt. Since defendants suffered no injury or prejudice as a result of the contempt order, their exceptions thereto and assignment of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phelps v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Ray v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Gea, Inc. v. Luxury Auctions Mktg., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Sharp v. SharpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Pass v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.