Legal Opinion

ADM Partnership v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 19, 1997No. 5, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The issue this case presents is whether the “voluntariness” element of the assumption of risk defense is met when an employee encounters a known risk while performing a responsibility of her employment, but, nevertheless, based solely on her subjective belief that the failure to fulfill that responsibility may result in adverse economic consequences to her employer and ultimately to herself, proceeds to confront the risk, sustaining, in the process, serious bodily injury. We shall answer in the affirmative.

In the case sub judice, Keen Tykenko Martin (Martin) and American…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Brown v. Quick Mix Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Schroyer v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Warner v. MarkoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Thomas v. Panco Management of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Crews v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API