Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Solano

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 6717-PRPublished

1Dissent

*403GORDON, Vice Chief Justice,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. It has long been established that pleas obtained through “coercion, terror, inducements, and subtle or blatant threats” are involuntary and violative of due process. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 1712, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). The constitutional status of guilty pleas induced by offers of adverse or lenient treatment to a person other than the accused presents a serious problem. Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 n. 8, 98 S.Ct. 663, 668 n. 8, 54 L.Ed.2d 604 (1978). These pleas pose a greater danger of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Aubrey Leroy NuckolsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API