Legal Opinion
Mark and Marie Roberts v. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 4, 2021No. 20-cv-970-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Mark and Marie Roberts v. Civil No. 20-cv-970-JD Opinion No.
2021 DNH 030
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. O R D E R Marie Roberts and her husband, Mark, bring product liability claims, other tort claims, and a claim for loss of consortium against Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., which arise from Marie’s injuries caused by a mesh device. The defendants move to dismiss several of the Robertses’ claims. The Robertses did not file an objection. Standard of Review When, as here, a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. CardinaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Pomerleau v. West Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roberts v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021