M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Foy
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*275OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Equity abhors discrimination.
Equity will not enforce discriminatory practices.
This court holds, for reasons set forth below, that a mortgage granted to a minority buyer for the purchase of property in a minority area which carries an interest rate that exceeds nine percent creates a rebuttable presumption of discriminatory practice.
This court further holds that the lender who has brought this proceeding to foreclose the mortgage must demonstrate by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the mortgage was not the product of unlawful discrimination.1 If…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Leibowits v. LeibowitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Fisher v. . HerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 2010