Legal Opinion

M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Foy

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*275OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Kramer, J.

Equity abhors discrimination.

Equity will not enforce discriminatory practices.

This court holds, for reasons set forth below, that a mortgage granted to a minority buyer for the purchase of property in a minority area which carries an interest rate that exceeds nine percent creates a rebuttable presumption of discriminatory practice.

This court further holds that the lender who has brought this proceeding to foreclose the mortgage must demonstrate by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the mortgage was not the product of unlawful discrimination.1 If…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Leibowits v. LeibowitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Fisher v. . HerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API