Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Button

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. S-8792, S-8942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard Button acknowledged his paternity of Vickie Hansen 1 in 1986 because he erroncously believed he was her father. Nine years later, the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) served Button with a Notice and Finding of Financial Responsibility assessing support arrears in excess of $40,000. Button pursued an administrative appeal and disestablished his paternity in superior court. Because CSED's support order remained open to review, and because Button rebutted the presumption of paternity created by his legal acknowledgment at his first formal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. B.E.B. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Gerke v. GerkeAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kilpper v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gregory Numann v. Diane Gallant f/k/a Diane NumannAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  5. Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API