Legal Opinion

Goodpasture v. Coastal Industrial Water Authority

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1973No. 16012PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Eminent domain proceeding. Appellants’ primary complaints on appeal are based on the denial by the trial judge of their motion to consolidate this cause with one brought to condemn an adjoining tract.

Th.e appellee says that the appellant has failed to preserve for appellate review the error, if any, of the trial court in denying the motion to consolidate.

Our case bore cause number 172,886 in the trial court. The condemnees included Goodpasture, Inc., Grady Goodpasture and Molly Goodpasture. The entire tract of 86.96 acres was taken by the condemnor.

A motion was filed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WilemonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sisk v. RandomTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Pritchett v. Highway Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dyches v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Preston v. Ohio Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raw Hide Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Maxus Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  2. Thomas v. Oil & Gas Building, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  4. Womack v. First National Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Fountain v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API