Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Warner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 8, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff (Flynn) unsuccessfully sought relief from a single justice of this court under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), from an order entered in the District Court pursuant to G. L. c. 209A (1994 ed.). Flynn makes three arguments in his initial brief, on appeal from a judgment denying relief. We do not consider new arguments belatedly raised in Flynn’s reply brief. The standard is whether the single justice committed an error of law or abuse of discretion in denying relief. Brossard v. West Roxbury Div. of the Dist. Court Dep’t, 417 Mass. 183, 184 (1994). We affirm.

1. Flynn argues that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Mahoney v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Brossard v. West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. O'BRIEN v. BorowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Brantley v. Hampden Division of the Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Larkin v. Ayer Division of District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API