Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Hampden Division of the Probate & Family Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 2010PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

For many years the judges of the Hampden Division of the Probate and Family Court Department (Hamp-den) have employed certain “protocols” or “procedures” (the terms are used by that court) in child-related litigation that are intended to assist them in making decisions concerning a child’s best interests, often in emergency circumstances. Pursuant to these protocols, judges, with the assistance of probation officers assigned to the court, orally obtain confidential information about litigants from the Department of Children and Families (department) that judges are permitted to consider as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bellermann v. Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Adoption of RoryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Care and Protection of M.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Diaz v. GomezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Harvard Climate Justice Coalition v. President of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API