Legal Opinion

Whirlpool Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 19, 1998No. 1—97—2306, 1—97—4082 consPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

There is nothing unusual about litigants jockeying for position. Sometimes position matters, sometimes it does not. Here, for four years the litigants have waged a fierce battle over which forum will host their pollution insurance coverage dispute. Here, apparently, position matters. We affirm the trial judge’s dismissal of the lawsuit on forum non conveniens grounds.

FACTS

In the early 1970s, Whirlpool, a Delaware corporation with its business headquarters in Michigan, sought excess insurance coverage on the “London Market.” It contacted Bowes & Company (Bowes), an independent Illinois broker,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. PSL Realty Co. v. Granite Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Vinson v. AllstateIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. GuerineIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Allianz Insurance Co. v. Guidant Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Roberts v. Illinois Power CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Dykstra v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. First National Bank v. GuerineIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API