Legal Opinion

Grayam v. Department of Health & Human Resources

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1997No. 24036, 24129PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORKMAN, Chief Justice:

This Court consolidated these two appeals because they involve a common issue regarding the legal effect of statutory amendments made to West Virginia Code § 9-5-11. Appellant in both cases, the Department of Health and Human Resources (“Appellant”), argues that the 1993 and 1995 amendments to West Virginia Code § 9-5-11 alter the traditional meaning of the term “subrogation,” as was applied by this Court in Kittle v. Icard, 185 W.Va. 126, 405 S.E.2d 456 (1991). To the contrary, Appellees, Amanda Grayam and James F. Hatfield, by Ricky Kennedy, his guardian and next…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cox v. AmickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Robinson v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Wine v. Globe American Casualty Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Estate of BainTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kanawha Valley Radiologists, Inc. v. One Valley Bank, N.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Anderson v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re E.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Estate of FerrelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API