Legal Opinion
Hiller v. King
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1951No. Civ. 14606PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The Hillers, as purchasers of a 50-acre tract of land from the Kings, alleging that the Kings had breached the contract, brought this action for its rescission, to cancel the deed of trust and promissory notes given by them in connection with the purchase, to recover moneys already paid, and to recover damages. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
In the year 1934 appellants purchased from the respondents three and one-half acres of land adjoining the Tunnel Road in Oakland, and appellants constructed a home on this parcel. Adjoining this property was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Loop Building Co. v. DecooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- White Point Co. v. HerringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Alaimo v. TsunodaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Johnson v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Totty v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954