Blockbuster Video, Inc. v. City of Overland Park
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Blockbuster Video, Inc., (Blockbuster) appeals the trial court’s ruling that Overland Park (City) did not improperly deny Blockbuster’s revised final development plan because the proposed continuous awning violated die City’s guidelines for shopping center design.
We affirm.
Blockbuster leased property in a Wal-Mart center in Overland Park. Blockbuster has a standard design package to identify its stores to the public, and its standard lease with franchisees provides it may terminate a lease if Blockbuster cannot use that standard design package. The record indicates that Blockbuster has 30…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Houston v. Board of City CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Miner v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- Hainline v. BondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1596 v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- R.H. Gump Revocable Trust v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Rodrock Enterprises, L.P. v. City of OlatheCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001