Legal Opinion
R.H. Gump Revocable Trust v. City of Wichita
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 14, 2006No. 94,312PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pierron, J.:
R.H. Gump Revocable Trust and Nordyke Ventures, L.L.C. (collectively “Gump”) appeal the decision of the district court affirming the decision of the City of Wichita (City) to deny a conditional use permit to allow construction of a cellular communications tower. Gump argues City acted unreasonably, City’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and City acted unreasonably by considering the court’s remand in executive session. We affirm.
R.H. Gump Revocable Trust, in the care of R.H. Gump, is the owner of real property located…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- T-Mobile Central v. UNIFIED GOV'T OF WYANDOTTEDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Verizon Wireless v. DOUGLAS CNTY. KS BD. OF COM'RS.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Friends of the Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Leffel v. CITY OF MISSION HILLSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.