Cox v. Indian Head Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
■THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ timely filed objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. Pursuant to standing orders of designation and 28 U.S.C. § 636, the undersigned referred the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment to the Magistrate Judge for a recommendation as to disposition. Having conducted a de novo review to those portions of the recommendation to which specific objections were filed, the recommendation is adopted, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burns v. MayerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2001
- Switzer v. RiveraDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2001
- Gallimore v. Newman MacHine Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Hazel v. Medical Action Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002