Legal Opinion

Great Divide Insurance v. Safeco Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 25, 2003No. A02A2315PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Chief Judge.

In this case, we are called upon to decide the priority between two companies providing uninsured motorist benefits to an injured insured. Applying the relevant tests used to determine the priority of “stacked” uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, we conclude that the “more closely identified with” test shows that the trial court correctly determined the priority of coverage. We therefore affirm.

David Vangiller brought an action against Daniel David Sallinen and Morris Communications 1 seeking damages for injuries Vangiller sustained in a motor vehicle collision.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Canal Insurance v. MerchantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Premier InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarendon National Insurance v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Progressive Bayside InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Sentinel Insurance company/the Hartford v. Usaa Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API