Legal Opinion

Clarendon National Insurance v. Sledge

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 2003No. A03A0791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

This appeal involves the respective liabilities of two insurance companies, Clarendon National Insurance Company and Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“USF&G”), which provided uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits to an injured insured. All of the involved parties filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The superior court determined that the policies afforded equal priority of uninsured motorist coverage and should be prorated. For the following reasons we conclude that the superior court erred, and we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Miller v. Harco National InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Canal Insurance v. MerchantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Continental Insurance v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Laviano v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Progressive Classic Insurance Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Progressive Bayside InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. James Simmons v. Sharon Haege EnglandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API