Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Shell Oil Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINO, J.,

(Pro Tempore)

The plaintiff, James Olenn Aiken, brought this action for damages against Shell Oil Co., a corporation, O. L. Huey, Roy Johnson, Robert MeKeown and Dan Milan, and charged them with negligently causing the plaintiff’s arrest and confinement on the criminal charge of feloniously uttering and publishing a forged bank check.

A jury in the Multnomah county circuit court for Oregon returned a verdict for the plaintiff and against the defendants O. L. Huey and Roy Johnson in the amount of $5,250, and for the defendants Robert Mc-Keown.and Dan Milan and against the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. West v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Collins v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Langen v. BorkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rush v. BuckleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Providence Health System-OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Shires v. CobbOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Scott v. KesselringOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Holland v. LutzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Lawson v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API