Legal Opinion

Rickel v. Republic Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 28,949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy presents the question whether under the terms of an insurance policy the word “grain” included 'cottonseed meal. The trial court held that it did not, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts were substantially these. The plaintiff carried insurance in defendant company for the total amount of $3,700, of which $2,000 was upon grain on the premises, in the barn, crib, gran*333ary, stack or shock. The insurance was against fire, lightning and windstorm. The plaintiff had cottonseed meal stored in a granary on the premises valued at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Kennedy v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Brenn v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Hewitt v. Watertown Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lervold v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Jackson v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Diemer v. Putnam County Farmers Mutual Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Hockens v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API