Legal Opinion

Martin v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided January 20, 1981No. TC 1412PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARLISLE B. ROBERTS, Judge.

Oral argument on the defendant’s Objections to Plaintiffs’ Cost Bill was held in the courtroom of the Oregon Tax Court in Salem on December 22/1980. No statement of disbursements was included in the plaintiffs’ Bill of Disbursements on December 16, 1980. Therefore, the plaintiffs, through their counsel, in open court, waived the claim for “disbursements” but orally repeated the claim for $8,200 of attorney fees.

The defendant alleged that ORS 305.490(2) (set out below) does not contemplate attorney fees in a case involving an employer’s duty to withhold and remit to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dan Bunn, Inc. v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hughes v. BembryOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Department of Social & Health Services v. GerlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waterbury v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API