Legal Opinion

Chiro-Med Review Co. v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

Chiro-Med Review Company (Chiro-Med) petitions for review of an order issued by a Hearing Officer of the Department of Labor and Industry (Department) which denied Chiro-Med’s appeal of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, Health Care Services Review Division’s (Bureau) decision to revoke its authorization to perform utilization reviews. We vacate the decision of the Hearing Officer and remand this case for the reasons set for the below.

Chiro-Med is a Utilization Review Organization (URO), which is an organization authorized by the Bureau to determine the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Life FellowshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Gilligan v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API