Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Ottoman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1928No. Docket No. 4504PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants, who were sued as sureties on an undertaking given by them to release an attachment. The attachment suit was commenced in the superior court of Los Angeles County on September 7, 1920, by the Collection Service Corporation, as assignee of Montgomery & Mathi Company, against Abrams & Cole, a copartnership, and others, to recover the' sum of $1,533.01, alleged to have b~en due and owing for merchandise sold and delivered. The defendants in. the attachment suit demurred to the complaint,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- First Congregational Church of Christ v. LowreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Scheeline v. MoshierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Daneri v. GazzolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. Highlands InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- V.I.P. Agency of Northern California, Inc. v. Duffy Electronics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Impac Imported Parts & Accessories Corp. v. RattrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Benjamin G. Hitchings, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- VIP AGENCY OF NO. CAL. v. Duffy ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979