Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1983No. CR82-60PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice. Appellants,

Tim McDaniel and Jaran Gookin, known as Jose, were convicted of the capital felony murder of Thomas Farnham, Jr., and sentenced to life without parole. For reversal, they argue three points in common: The trial court erred in refusing to sever the charges and try thém separately; they were wrongfully restricted in peremptory challenges; and the trial judge should have granted motions for mistrial after telling the jury this “could very well be a divided type of trial”.

Additionally, McDaniel contends grounds for a mistrial occurred when a witness stated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. The People v. BrauneIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Jung v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cryts v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. ThibodeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Clines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Rouster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ruiz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API