Hughes v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
We are called upon in this case to examine the validity and scope of what is commonly known as the “routine booking question” exception to the requirements of Miranda v. Ari zona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The precise issue before the Court is whether the “routine booking question” exception encompasses a question on an arrest intake form as to whether the arrestee is a “narcotics or drug user.” For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that it does not. Accordingly, the admission of testimony regarding the arrestee’s response, absent Miranda…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Alford, Cecil EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Cruz, Adelfo RamirezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.