Pease-Madore v. State, Dept. of Corrections
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STOWERS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A prisoner brings three appeals of prison disciplinary proceedings for major infractions. The prisoner, representing himself, originally appealed to the superintendent and subsequently obtained counsel and appealed to the superior court.
In Wolff v. McDonnell , the United States Supreme Court held that federal procedural due process requires "a 'written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons' for the disciplinary action." 1 In McGinnis v. Stevens , this court held that due process under the Alaska Constitution requires a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska v. John Does 1-6Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Huber v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.