Legal Opinion

State Collection Bureau, Inc. v. Roybal

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1958No. 6364PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellant, defendant below appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a judgment, assertédly a default judgment.

The complaint was founded on contract and the material allegations were put in issue by answer. The answer also set ■forth four affirmative defenses. Pursuant to notice by mail to the parties, dated October 31, 1956, the cause was set for trial November 30, 1956. On the day set, appellant failed to appear. Nevertheless, a hearing ex parte was had and judgment was rendered for appellee. Subsequently, on January 23, 1957, appellant filed a motion to vacate the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams & McGahey v. NeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Rutland Transit Company v. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Company and Chicago Tunnel Terminal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. Ranchers Exploration & Development Co. v. BenedictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stafford v. DickisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Chavez v. County of ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wooley v. WickerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. COSTAL PLAINS OIL COMPANY v. DouglasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API