McConnell v. City of Osage
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Mitchell District Court. — Hon. J. B. Cl eland, Judge. Action for personal injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk in the defendant city. There was a judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGfbander, J.
1. Witnesses: number: limitation by court: appeal: no exceptions. — I. The trial court limited the number of witnesses for each side to six on the question of general condition of the walk where the plaintiff was injured, and the appellant complains of such action of the court. So far as we can judge, the order was made near the commencement of the trial, and without objection by either party. Later plaintiff desired to introduce additional witnesses, which the court refused. From the state of the record, it does not appear that the question is properly before us for review, for we find ño…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKinney v. Grand Street, Prospect Park & Flatbush RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Muldowney v. Ill. Cent. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Ferguson v. Davis CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Armstrong v. Town of AckleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Campau v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Prader v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Burgess v. Sims Drug Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.