Legal Opinion

Parahams v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2009No. 71A03-0902-CR-77PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Jonathan Parahams ("Parahams") was convicted in St. Joseph Superior Court of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. Parahams appeals and argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. Concluding that the State presented sufficient evidence that Para-hams resisted law enforcement, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On June 12, 2007, Officer Joseph Leszce-zynski ("Officer Leszezynksi") and Officer Chicowiez ("Officer Chicowicz") responded to a dispatch reporting a black male in a red vehicle with people coming and going. When the officers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fadell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bonner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Reinhardt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Michael R. Houston v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Stewart v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. David Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API