Legal Opinion

Waters v. Bourhis

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1985No. S.F. 24611PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.*

In March 1980, plaintiff Barbara Waters filed this action against defendant Ray Bourhis, an attorney who had represented her in an earlier suit against a psychiatrist, contending that the contingency fee which defendant had obtained after settlement of the earlier action exceeded the maximum fee permitted by Business and Professions Code section 6146, a provision of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act of 1975 (MICRA).1 Defendant moved for summary judgment, asserting that the ear*428lier lawsuit was not an action for “professional negligence” within the meaning of section…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Hedlund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API