Legal Opinion

Maryland Dredging & Contracting Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1929No. F-289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court · SinnottSinnott, Judge

Plaintiff herein seeks to recover from defendant the sum of $54,081.60, in connection with a certain contract which was entered into on August 19, 1919, with the United States for dredging in the Schuylkill River at Philadelphia. Plaintiff’s claim consists of five items:

1. For slope dredging_$15, 000. 54

2. For meals furnished Government employees_ 170.20

3. Excess deductions made for ’ inspection and superin-tendence_ 198.14

4. Withheld for superintendence and inspection charges- 2, 822.46

5. Ledge rock excavation_ 35, 896. 26

Total_ 54, 087.60

The above item (1), $15,000.54, was approved by the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Moss.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Penn Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  5. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. S & E Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Southwestern Engineering Co.United States Court of Claims · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API