In re Lipson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Life, J.
The petitioner is the duly appointed Commissioner of Accounts of Nassau County. In the course of the conduct of his investigation into the accounts, methods and activities of the Department of Public Works of the county, he caused to be issued subpoenas duces tecum for three corporations and four individuals (employees of said corporations). The subpoenas required them to attend at the time and place designated to testify in private in connection with the investigation and to produce their books and records for use upon the inquiry. The witnesses responded to the subpoenas, were represented…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ottinger v. State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Bowles v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- In Re Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rushmore v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Lipson v. George Malvese & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Piloff v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1963