Legal Opinion
In Re Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 1, 1936No. 395PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, acting under the authority of section 21 (a) and (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78u (a, b), on November 16, 1935, had ordered that an investigation be made to determine whether Pirnie Simons & Company, Inc., had violated, or were about to violate, section 9 (a) (1-5) of the act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78i (a) (1-5), in transactions in the stock of Dictograph Products Company, Inc. The order appointed an officer of the Commission to administer oaths and subpoena witnesses. Each of the appellants, alleged to be employees of Pirnie Simons &…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Woolley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Bowles v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.