Molitor v. Robinson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. Bepleyin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The title to a horse is in controversy in this suit. Plaintiff claims it by purchase from Albert Molitor, the former owner, and the • defendant Eobinson claims a right to hold it as constable by virtue of a levy of an execution issued on a judgment in .favor of Crippen, the other defendant. The levy was made after the pretended purchase by plaintiff, and defendants dispute the bona fieles of the purchase.
Several exceptions were taken to the proof of the judgment and execution, but we think no error wras committed in receiving them in evidence. The real controversy arose upon the fact that no…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Crane v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Nicholson v. DyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hauser v. BeatyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Burch v. BarendsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.