Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Beaty

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought replevin for a. stock of groceries.

On the 15th day of May, 1891, one Gauntlet was the owner of the stock in question, and was largely indebted to various persons. Among the rest was the plaintiff in the sum of $800, and who also had in his hands notes for collection amounting to about $400. On the date referred to certain creditors, referred to in the record as Toledo creditors, brought a suit in attachment against Gauntlet in justice’s court, for about the sum of $130, and caused the attachment tó be levied upon the goods in question by the defendant, who was acting as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Foster v. WileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Molitor v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aspell v. HosbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Moore v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API