Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Transx Ltd.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1993No. Civ. 4-92-870PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court denies the defendant’s motion and remands this matter to state court because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the case.

BACKGROUND

The factual record and legal analyses set forth by the parties are scant. Nevertheless, the court will reconstruct the factual background and ferret out the legal arguments and applicable law so that it can analyze the motion before it.

Defendant Transx Ltd. (“Transx”) employed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Curlee v. Kootenai County Fire & RescueIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kowalewski v. SamandarovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Barbara Wytrwal v. Saco School BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Valdes v. Swift Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API