Legal Opinion

Peters v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1971No. State 157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are raised by writs of error:(1) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to allow a withdrawal of the guilty plea; and(2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in selecting the sentence imposed?

Withdrawal of guilty plea.

The defendant asks this court to find that indigent defendants are entitled to one change of appointed counsel as a matter of right. The defendant requested the trial court to appoint new counsel for him because he and his first appointed counsel were “incompatible as to the line of defense,” and because the defendant wanted to get “another legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BiastockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. ScarbroughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API