State v. Johnson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The sole issue here is whether the defendant was entitled to counsel at the time of his trial on a felony charge.
At his first appearance in court, he was established to be indigent and an attorney was appointed to represent him. Such court-appointed attorney represented him at the time of the preliminary hearing and at the arraignment.
At a court proceeding to set a date for trial, the court-appointed attorney stated that he could not try the case until a date in April. The defendant, as is uncommon enough these days, insisted upon the case being tried at an earlier date. The defendant, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Keller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Vigil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ScarbroughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.