Legal Opinion

Stamey v. Fortner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 7 Div. 296PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill by Mrs. Tenney Stamey and others, exhibited in the circuit court of DeKaib county, against Wallace Fortner and others. In the bill as originally filed, the complainants sought to have three certain deeds of conveyance, executed by W. H. Fortner, canceled for failure of the grantees to pay certain annual rents, constituting conditions subsequent, and for an accounting.

It appears from the averments of the bill that W. H. Fortner in his lifetime executed three separate conveyances, one to Wallace Fortner, one to Archibald Fortner, and one to J. W. Fortner. These grantees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. Henry v. IdeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Handley v. HeflinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Pitts v. PowledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Glass v. StampsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Glass v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Jarrett v. HagedornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Littleton v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API