Cheltenham Township v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
The Township of Cheltenham, when it granted consent to the Philadelphia, Cheltenham and Jenkintown Passenger Eailway Company to operate on Old York Eoad, incorporated in the agreement an undertaking on the part of the railway company “To maintain at the intersection of every township road in Cheltenham Township a good and sufficient, safe and smooth passageway across said Old York Eoad of the width of the intersecting road.” Philadelphia Eapid Transit Company, the appellant, has succeeded to all the rights and assumed all the obligations of the Philadelphia,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Commonwealth v. Newton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Township of North Middleton v. WearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greene County v. Center TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Szilagyi v. BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Ruch v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Bebbington, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1935
- Commonwealth v. Delaware Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.