Legal Opinion

Szilagyi v. Bethlehem

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1933No. Appeals, 66 and 67PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kbphaet,

June 30, 1933:

The City of Bethlehem contracted with the Rathbun Company for the improvement of two city streets. The contractor gave one bond for each contract, but the bonds did not include labor and materialmen as obligees or potential use-plaintiffs, nor did the city require an additional bond for the payment of labor, material and machinery used. The contractor became bankrupt and failed to pay the appellants who furnished materials to the contractor. This suit was instituted in trespass against the city to recover damages arising out of the neglect of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Murdock Parlor Grate Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Davidson, Exrx. v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Welch v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Henry Shenk Co. v. Erie CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Leary v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API