Legal Opinion
United States v. Elliott Truck Parts, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 18, 1957No. Civ. A. 14870PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Action by plaintiff to recover excess costs allegedly suffered and resulting from defendant’s breach of three contracts. Execution of the contracts and .failure to perform is admitted but defendant contends failure justified and that plaintiff has not suffered damages alleged.
Parties have submitted exhibits and a stipulation.
Findings of Fact
On June 20, 1950 plaintiff awarded defendant, as low competitive bidder, three contracts numbered 8373, 8434 and 8549 providing for delivery of items described therein (154 truck axles and 1,-881 propeller shafts) within 120 to 180…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
- Deming v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
- Sunswick Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. Russell Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- George R. Hoffmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Elliott Truck Parts, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Elliott Truck Parts, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Elliott Truck Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958