Legal Opinion

Consolidated Airborne Systems, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1965No. 389-61PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was referred pursuant to Rule 54(b) to Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson with directions to make his recommendation for conclusion of law on plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The commissioner has done so in an opinion filed April 12, 1965, wherein he recommended that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied, defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment be allowed as to the petition but denied as to the counterclaim and that plaintiff’s petition and defendant’s counterclaim be dismissed. It appears to the court that neither party has…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. California Bridge & Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Carnegie Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. United States v. Wegematic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API