Legal Opinion
Zar v. South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1985No. 14732PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Acting Justice.
This is an appeal from an order restraining the South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists (Board) from further proceedings regarding the discipline of Dr. David Zar (Zar) for alleged unprofessional conduct. We reverse and remand.
On September 22, 1983, Board sent notice of formal action and hearing to Zar, a psychologist licensed to practice in South Dakota. The notice informed Zar that the Board had voted to hold a formal hearing to determine whether his license should be suspended, revoked or cancelled for alleged violations of the “Ethical Principles of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ward v. KeenanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. KolmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of ZarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Dr. David Zar v. South Dakota Board Of Examiners Of PsychologistsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Frost v. COM'R, NEW HAMPSHIRE BANKING DEPT.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Robinson v. Human Relations CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.