Legal Opinion

New Shrewsbury Borough v. BLOCK 115, LOT 4, ASSESSED TO HATAHWAY

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 18, 1962PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

74 N.J. Super. 1 (1962)

180 A.2d 387

BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

BLOCK 115. LOT 4, ASSESSED TO WILLIAM HATHAWAY AND OTHER LANDS, HERBERT HARVEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 2, 1962.

Decided April 18, 1962.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. William H. Burns, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Kantor & Burns, attorneys).

Mr. Patrick J. McGann, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner & Carotenuto, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.

He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. State v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Township of Lakewood v. Block 251, Parcel 34, Lots 3359 to 3370 Incl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Quiles v. New Jersey Metals Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Township of Teaneck v. Block 427, Lots 9-10, Assessed to KlugSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Terrace View Gardens v. Township of DoverNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
  2. M & D ASSOCIATES v. MandaraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Town of Phillipsburg v. BlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Powder Mill I Associates v. Township of HamiltonNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  5. Garden State Racing Ass'n v. Township of Cherry HillNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API