Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Township of Teaneck v. Block 427, Lots 9-10, Assessed to Klug

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 24, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burling, J.

The controversy on this appeal involves the validity of a prior judgment of foreclosure in barring all rights of redemption in lands hereinafter referred to located within the Township of Teaneck in Bergen County.

The present action was instituted by the Township of Teaneck (hereinafter referred to as Teaneck) pursuant to the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, L. 1948, c. 96, sec. 1 et seq. (R. 8. 54:5-104.29 et seq.), in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, to foreclose certain tax sale certificates of which it was the owner. Upon a determination…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cooley v. Snake River Imp. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Shrewsbury Borough v. BLOCK 115, LOT 4, ASSESSED TO HATAHWAYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  4. In Re BeerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Township of Long Beach v. Lot No. 3, Block No. 9New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API