Legal Opinion

State v. Edison

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1999No. 03S01-9803-CC-00022PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, Jr, Justice.

We granted this Tenn.RApp.P. 11 appeal to determine the appropriate standard of review of a trial court’s decision to admit a breath-alcohol test result under State v. Sensing, 843 S.W.2d 412 (Tenn.1992). The Court of Criminal Appeals held that the trial court had not abused its discretion in admitting the test result of the defendant, Jerry Wayne Edison. 1 We affirm the judgment of the intermediate appellate court and conclude that a trial court’s Sensing decision must be presumed correct on appeal unless the preponderance of the evidence is to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OdomTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BallardTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BrimmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. McLeodTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Pylant v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GilleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. State v. WebbCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. State v. ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. State v. ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API